College

Jun. 20th, 2009 04:42 pm
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
Got my work back.
Turns out the bit about presentation I didn't understand or do was more icing than anything, and didn't knock my grade down.

74%

Last line of feedback says "This could have been a really excellent assignment if you had presented it more accessibly, demonstrating more awareness of the needs of your intended audience. As it is, it amply demonstrates your strengths, and your weaknesses."

Yes. Fair.

Grade for the unit is 77%, in the top band, on course for a First. Win!


Next year I will probably be doing 40 credits, because the schedule isn't convenient.

But, I have discovered a cool thing: I could use the BBC writers room script and feedback process to do my Work Based Learning unit, rather than, you know, work. Er, not that scriptwriting isn't work. If it works. ANYway, this would be cool. Thing of it is, it only works if I get as far as the feedback stage, and to do that I have to be actually quite good.
... am not sure if I'm actually any good at all.
Shall find out.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I did not like it.

I'm trying to sort out which bits I disliked were performance and which were Shakespeare.
Read more... )
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I've reached a bit of essay that once again makes much of the differences in a single word between editions. Hamlet starts a soliloquy 'O that this too too solid flesh would melt.'
Except, of course, when he starts it with 'sallied' or 'sullied'.

Making a couple of pages out of this difference starts off with a lot of uphill with me. I've been reading these renaissance things in various versions for a few months now and the one thing that drives me absolutely nuts is that they had not, as yet, invented spelling. Sure, words looked roughly the same at various points on the same page, but then they'd up and do different just because they happened to feel like it this time. The time I've spent just going through the things with a red pen is, well, rather longer than I can really justify. I'm sure they had rules. I'm just as sure they didn't stick to them. So, first point:
You can't make an essay out of what might just as well be a typo.

Second and more important, all this argument seems to me to stem from the fundamental misperception of this play as a written text. And, understandable as that is for something we've got three printed versions of, that's just not right. Hamlet was written for performance, it was written to be spoken. And when you're speaking aloud, what's the difference between sallied sullied solid? On the page, sure, you can go back and stare at it and puzzle about it. But on the stage it's barely an eyeblink of a word, and if it's even hearable at all depends on the accent of the particular performer. And that isn't a problem, it's an opportunity. You want three meanings in your word? Okay, can do!

It's like the opening credits to Charmed... yes I'm comparing Charmed to Shakespeare... ANYway, there's this song over the credits, and I can't do this properly in writing, but it says 'I am the sun and air'. Or possibly 'I am the son and heir'. Or possibly some mix of the set. And subtitles have to choose which way to do it, but the song itself can carry all the meanings and benefit thereby.

Arguing which one Shakespeare meant is going to be fruitless until we invent a time machine.
More profitable by far to simply listen.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
You know that thing where you've studied and studied and now you have a deadline that's suddenly a week closer than it was when you sat down and decided to devote a week to working on this project and what you basically have is a book full of highlighter and a blank page?
I have that thing. Read more... )
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I slept most of today, since yesterday was Very Long, and that results in me thinking a lot of random stuff, recombining all the recent input. And after a semester on the Renaissance a lot of that random is about Elizabethan England and associated cultural threads. But I'm trying to write something SF lately, so: Renaissance styled cyberpunk. Read more... )

Renaissance preoccupations and our own are different but I think a lot of the tensions are still there, and can be played out in big space battles.

Also, in my head, it's all really pretty. Specially the outfits with the silver or gold edges, the fabric cut up so they're basically wearing ribbons, and the tiny flashy clever tech holding it all together.

London!

Apr. 16th, 2009 09:47 pm
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I went to London!
0830 to 2100 door to door, with between 1200 and maybe 1700 spent in art gallery.
I went to the National Gallery and saw art up to Charles I, and a couple other pictures in passing. I listened to half the guided tour before it went well out of my timeframe. It started with The Ambassadors, and I guess what we learned in class was pretty good cause I pretty much knew all that stuff.
I have postcards now of many of the good bits.
Then we left that one and went next door to the portraits and looked at Tudor and Elizabethan portraits.

I think today I saw most of the pictures we've studied in class.
They are much bigger in real than in posters.
Also the colors have to be seen to be believed.

I didn't buy any books, mostly cause the big shop was by the other entrance from where we'd stashed our coats. I did get a dozen postcards. But they're all very pretty.
I resisted getting a A0 reproduction of anything, even if it would be really cool, cause I haven't got that much wall. Also cause I was going to spend that money on fixing the laptop.

The timing of today worked pretty much as planned, except I had not factored in that leaving the art place at everyone-leaves time means all of London is also leaving, and that means they're all trying to fit in to the same train. OMG remind me to never ever do that again. *Shudders*

So I spent... 7 hours travel and 5 hours looking at things? Hmmm, better ratio than when I went to the Doctor Who exhibition.

Home now. Had a bath. No offence to any individual bit of London, but put it all together and there's many many humans and I think any given line of sight had more people in it than Dereham streets do in an hour and then they all crammed in to the six feet around the doors on the tube train. And I had to hold on to a pole that like everyone else in London had been holding on to. And... argh. So I may be having a lot of baths soon.

But I looked at many many many many many pictures today, and the plan worked, and I only had trouble breathing when there were too many people to have the actual space necessary, so I think that's a multi point win.

Now I shall eat my pasta and sauce and remind myself to actually pack something not chocolate or pancake based next time and then to sleep.

(Pictures! Cool! And really big!)
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I have finished reading Hamlet for class.
It's so frustrating. A good performance takes even these so familiar words and breathes life into them, until they're happening right there in front of you. By the end of DT's Hamlet even though I had bits memorised the play faded into the background and the emotion of the final scene totally grabbed me. It was brilliant.
And now I read it, and it's words on a page, and I can't keep hold of the other feeling at all.
Ink and paper, gone all flat.
Frustrating.

They're very good words, but the meaning feels so easy when it's already acted and spoken and you can't skip back up a line and wonder what that bit meant and get hung up on the tricky bits. I feel like I'm stumbling around in the text just a little like I usually did a hockey field. Sure in theory I know how it works, and yet tangles keep happening.

On the plus side, I have found the parts I need to know for class, for the assignment, and for comparison with the renaissance stuff we've been studying up on. Lots of good quotes, lots of bits I can stick to Ovid or whatever, lots of stuff about spirits and heaven and hell and how all that worked that I can use to compare with Faustus in the assignment.

... I'd like to think up some good theme that would let me use lots of pictures of swords and jewelry for the assignment, but half the marks go on it so I think I need to stick with themes that I know will work. Or possibly do two projects and see how they come out.

Having just read Dr Faustus the part where Hamlet has every reason to believe the ghost is in fact a devil sent to mess him up stands out quite sharply. If you believe the ghost completely then all Hamlet's tough choices look a bit like dithering and flapping about. You have to doubt it, doubt his senses or his 'father' or his reading of the situation, before it all looks difficult enough to wait for. Or at least you have to have some undramatic reservations about the whole stabbing your uncle thing.

I still love Hamlet but I'm really very looking forward to DT's version on DVD. The play fades; it's integral to my understanding Hamlet's emotional state that transient experiences fade. But having noticed that, I'd rather like it back now.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I have a bouncy happy feeling of Things Done now, even though the Things, in general, did not get very Done.

I went to Renaissance lesson and contributed intelligently.
This was massively helped by having read the footnotes and handouts.
... I purely do not understand why people do lessons without doing the reading.

There was Working In Groups again. Unfortunately I'm tethered to the wall six feet away from others, so it was a bit more Shouting At Groups. Teach asked them to move to me but nobody actually did. I'm beginning to think I'm secretly a skunk and nobody telled me.

Working In Groups would feel a bit less futile if there was more Working. I mean, even after the becoming groups phase, there wasn't very good working. The task was to work on the opening soliloquy (did I spell that right?) of Dr Faustus, suggesting how we would stage it, with Renaissance clothes and props but a modern sensibility to the acting and directing. I kind of gave up on Groups and worked through the lines up to him dismissing logic. Then I looked up and tuned in to the rest of the group, and they were discussing how to dress up the Good and Evil Angels and how to get them on stage. I pointed out we were stopping several lines before that and only doing the bit with only Faustus talking. Then I went back and did some more up to when he gives up on medicine. I look up again, and they're talking about how Faustus should walk on carrying a laptop.
... I wonder if these people ever listen even a tiny bit and point out that, not only does that not fit the brief, but it does not fit thematically. He's frustrated with the limitations of knowledge, having studied everything available to him at the time. Give him a laptop and an internet connection and... well, we decided he'd sell his soul for such a thing, and I said I know the feeling.
... if he had the internet to study, he would not go to hell?
... this is not the usual idea about the impact of the net on morality...
Read more... )
Y'all are probably less fascinated with Dr Faustus than I am right now, but as ever with drama I'm finding the more I get in to the details the more interesting it gets.

Lesson done I had an hour before an appointment so I listened to Brief Lives on audio CD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brief_Lives
Wiki mentions 'colorful gossipy tone'. What it doesn't mention is that it is, in parts, bloody *hilarious*. Read more... )
The meeting I was waiting for went less well. The saga of the laptop battery continues. Read more... )
After all that I'm up to 5 different people consulted... no, depends if you count the tech support guy and the people on the desks who say the other people aren't there... Ah, it might be up to nine. Which, hey, lucky!
So tomorrow I start again with a new set of phone numbers.

Yes it would be easier for me to pay for it out of pocket, but it's £92, ninety two pounds that assorted experts thought was already covered by the money already paid, and also having consulted those nine different people just giving up feels silly.

So then I went into town and bought lunch (vegetable pasties still of win) and headed for the UEA library with Huge Heavy Book OF DOOM to give back. The book is Civilization of Renaissance Europe, or something near to that, and it is Very Huge Indeed. I've carried it up and back to Norwich... 3 times? Due to failure to acutally get to the library. Today I got all the way there! Yaay me!
... the returns machine was broken.
There's a returns slot by the reception desk that should, probably, work just as well, but, well.

I spent an hour looking at pictures, specifically Boticelli's illustrations to Dante's Divine Comedy. Gorgeous stuff. I borrowed a translation of Dante, though not the one I wanted, because someone was sitting in front of the shelf with their work spread out and since I couldn't see the book I wanted from standing either side of them I decided not to risk the chance that all the fuss of moving them might not result in finding the thing anyway.
I also borrowed a book on Classical and Christian references in Renaissance Poetry, which would have been more use before the poetry exam but still connects to one of the major themes of the semester. Teach can't lend her copy out because it is read to death and falling to bits, as she repeatedly tells us, so I shall see what is so cool about it.

Then I caught the bus home.
I got out a stop early and went through the supermarket and remembered to buy orange juice.

... *reads all that list*
... okay, so, yes, Things were indeed Done.

And now I have donuts.
... and sleepy.
... I think I had 4 hours sleep last night.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I am reading up on Dr Faustus for class. I find it dramatically less than compelling, a couple of good speeches to start and end but a bit of nothing much in the middle. But they are very good speeches.

I started reading the York Notes Advanced to go with it but I think they've very badly screwed up the theology. They say that the play involves an angry God who can't/won't save Faustus because contracts are binding even on God. I think that can't be supported either within the text or within relevant Christian thought. Faustus' fall is explicitly said to be because of Pride and Despair. He has the pride to think that his sin, of all the sins in history, is the only unforgivable one. He despairs, and turns away from God. He won't believe he can be saved, he won't ask for forgiveness, and when he calls on Christ he immediately gets so scared of the Devil he turns around and begs mercy off the evil ones instead. He denies that God has the power to save him, to protect him from devils. And finally he keeps trying to get God to save his *life*, to bring him bodily up to heaven, in a mirror of what he fears from the devil, being taken quick and in body down to hell. He's afraid of death, he wants *breath*, but he doesn't properly ask God to save his *soul*. Read more... )

Now I've spent all that long looking closer at it I think I like it more as a play. The scenes with Faustus in them hang together and plot a downward spiral. Maybe it's the other bits with the comedy I don't like... but there's a point to those as well. Hmmm.

Okay, so, done quite a lot of studying.

Tisn't exactly relevant for the assignment. Wonder how I could make it so.

I still like Hamlet better.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
the good news is I have decided I like sonnets. I dislike the thread of misogyny and woman blaming that runs through many of the petrarchan or courtly love type ones, all that 'you're so unfair and unfeeling and horrible and all these bad words and if you're not you got to prove it by shagging me'. :eyeroll: Annoying. But ones that are all talking about love and how much you love and how confusing love is and how good the beloved is, that's kind of cool. Mostly though I like sonnets because they have a fixed form, they're short, they've got the volta in one of very few places, they've got a handful of rhyme schemes, and yet you can say almost anything with them. Bloody clever.

the bad news is I am totally going to bork this exam. I know a ton about the renaissance now that I didn't know when this semester started. That's a win. I've done a ton of studying. I've read books. I've read essays. I've looked stuff up on JSTOR. I've read life stories and got a feeling for how the Elizabethan court worked and realised it's so the tip of the iceberg I could happily poke around in there for years. This is all great. But can I use all that to write for ninety minutes on two sonnets? I would first have to know where to start. And, crucially, choose two and only two sonnets.

They have to both be by Sidney purely because I never got around to reading about anyone else. I'm tempted to pick a Shakespeare and compare a discourse of patronage and money references with the favour of princes political references, the pro poet with the courtier. But I'd have to know more Shakespeare to do that. And, rather unfortunately, I'd have to know more Sidney. I don't know how I don't know enough, but there you go, I look at the poems and I'm just a bit lost.

Can I go back to writing stories? Or reading them. Life stories and histories are apparently just as fun as fictions if I find the right threads to follow. Incredibly frustrating in a feminist way of course, because reality frequently is, but still fascinating.

But no. I cannot go talk about biographical references in Sidney's poems, not least because they were probably part of a game and the poetic persona of Astrophil might have been made up to cheer up the Stella lady, or because she asked for poems. It might be like a fic challenge, rather than your actual adulterous romance. Can't spend too long on his real life when all the books agree that's just one thread. And, also, I have to do close reading to bring in any such references, and... *blinks in vague incomprehension*

I'm sure I know what all these words mean. I looked up the difficult ones. If I could pick two and only two sonnets I could look up each and every one. But nooooo. Concentration fail.

Astrophel and Stella 1, 2, 3, 5, 23, 31, 52, 54, 67, 71, 72, 81, 107, 108

'Petrarchan love is a game in which three powerful discourses meet and join hands: love, religion and politics'
Examine evidence of these three discourses and of any conflict and contradictions between these in the two sonnets you have chosen.

There's other quotes I could start with but that love/religion/politics one is so my sort of thing in the general way.

Have to pick one from early and one from late, to demonstrate the divided structure of sonnet sequences, how they change (in this case from idealisation/frustration to outright physical desire, iirc). If I pick 1 or 5 I have to be really excellently good because we've been over them in class in detail and I'd have to get more out of them, and I wouldn't, really.

http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/stella.html

Here, have a read, see what you think...
*sigh*
*headdesk*

Right. Tomorrow, teach will tell us how to answer so we pass. I hope.
Tonight I sleep.


ETA: So this would be the pre-exam panic attack on schedule then? Yes.
I just remembered why spending last weekend partying was not, in fact, the entirely stupid choice.
I need to learn to relax.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I've been reading these all morning, and they are not quite what I expected. I think the teacher read out the best bit. The back of the book can say all it wants about 'his irony and his bubbling sense of fun' but 'The Art of Love' section is mostly very annoying, ranging right up to 'kill it with fire' when it says straight out that rape is perfectly acceptable because all women want to be raped really *kill kill stompy rage*. Even the less obviously ghastly bits are Read more... )
ANYway

My initial idea of finding bits for sexy voices to read out has found mostly the bits from class. That section was about the importance of simultaneous orgasm.Read more... )


Of course the whole thing is supposed to be mostly useful for class, where the metaphors of pursuit, conquest, hunting, farming, and warfare, along with a lot of nautical stuff, persist in the poetry of later ages. Including the really annoying levels. Like women persistently being compared to animals and ships and things, rather than thinking beings.
So, I can now observe those metaphors in poems, probably.
Look at me be studious...

Now I just have to do the actual homework...

Happy!

Mar. 10th, 2009 06:01 pm
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I saw a wol on the bus! Erm, Owl. Yes. I can type it the right way around even if I never can say it without slowing right down.
I see magpies often and often, but today there was a lovely big owl sitting on a tree that turned its head right around to watch the bus go past. Win!
Also I had chocolate biscuits. So I has much happy.

I started today not happy at all, grumpy, feeling ill, and with a red bill from college to sort out. Blah.

The red bill was duly sorted, Read more... )

Then there was a lesson on Renaissance sonnet sequences.
Read more... )

And I borrowed another Ovid book, this one the Erotic Poems. Teach read out a bit in class, and the dude was not subtle. This should be fun.

... also, I kind of want to take it to the Hub, on the offchance I could get certain persons to read bits out...

... don't know yet, have only heard that one section...
... also, everyone there is Torchwood geeks, but that doesn't mean they're classical poetry geeks. Is possibly not a great plan.

I need something to keep my attention on poetry. Imagining it in a Welsh accent may well help. Or American. Certain Americans. Or... well, anyways, voices.
... I guess I can see Teacher's point about 'aloud'.

Thursday we will be studying Shakespeare sonnets, which will be fun. Also Mary Wroth, the one woman on this bit of the course. So far the crit essay we're referring back to doesn't help specifically with reading those ones because it was pre-feminism so hadn't heard of her.

... yes, got to love those up to the minute sources in English Lit.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
Have successfully done both laundry and reading.
I borrowed Sir Philip Sidney, Courtier Poet by Katherine Duncan-Jones. Teacher recommended.
So far I have read the first chapter and skimmed the second, and so far I have found two things that contradict at least in part what we were told out loud in class.

The first chapter is interesting because it's all about women. Read more... )
I don't understand the guy who was complaining about how we don't need all this history to understand the poems. The more you read about what was happening at the time, families that were mostly young girls who kept dying as children, the only male heir being a nephew or cousin or someone who married in, people being widowed and remarrying so much, disease leaving permanent and very visible scars, family quarrels about who dumped who when that turn into massive political weights that shove history around, the more you realise all this is woven in to the poetry like the long strong threads. Sure, the pretty patterns are words on a page, we can see those, but it's the stuff holding it all together that tells us why it mattered. How much more threatening an adulterous passion when large units of politics and economy are bound up in the people involved? And how much of a barrier would marriage truly seem when death was so present? It all adds depth.

It's quite frustrating being both interested and dozing off over the book.

But hey, sink unblocked, cleaner did the magic, laundry got done, reading got done, Wednesday jobs achieved. I can fall asleep again if I wants to.
... which really yes.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I read a couple more essays from one of the Renaissance books. I should put the title in here but it's on the other side of the room and I can't be bothered. Something about Renaissance Writing.

one was about patronage. Read more... )

I am grumbly. This isn't the kind of analysis I like. I like stuff that I can translate into ways to get on and write better stuff.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
"in spite of these historical changes, the psychological dynamics of unrequited love remained the same. The urge to idealize and the desire for satisfaction remained in a tense co-existence, and both continued to attach themselves to unattainable objects. Genre, because it is both conservative and progressive, mediates between the social change and the unchanged psychological impulses. The English sonneteers adjust the formal structure of the genre to incorporate changed attitudes towards women, love and sexuality."

it's not just unrequited love that's a psychological dynamic that stays the same even when society changes. So right now I'm wondering if this has something to do with what was being called 'unoriginality' in Science Fiction. The kind of social changes that the 20th century lived through were huge and kept on heading into new areas, and it could easily be that society was changing faster than individuals so fiction was used and needed to help mediate and smooth the change. Is that still true? Are there new huge changes, or is it more that existing changes just keep rolling out? So fiction would be dealing with the same things, on different scales, rather than with huge new things.

don't know. thought needs poking. I write it down and go read the other 6 pages.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
Operation 'read the handouts' has been derailed by finding that both Blackboard pdf and photocopied paper versions are really bad copies with some pages missing, words chopped off, and a duplicate page at the end that chops off the vast majority of the footnotes.
Luckily it has the full cite on the top and I can dig it out of JSTOR.
Which means reading it in pdf on my computer, but that's okay.

How can someone just not notice it goes from page 1 to 4 in the middle of a sentence?
and teacher said this handout has been used for years.
*blinky*
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I realise the point of the renaissance module is to see how the renaissance was different, and I realise poetry is an important type of lit, and I do know that studying the language in such detail one sonnet at a time is valuable for close reading of all sorts, but...
if sonnet sequences only lasted for a generation 500 years ago, are they really still so interesting we must study them now? For weeks and weeks when we could be doing more plays?
*sigh*

Last time I did poetry I got through it by deciding the fixed form was quite a lot like TV, having a set length and particular turning points and a tag. I wrote a poem about Torchwood. It's a bit out of date now.
I could try writing a sonnet sequence about Torchwood. One poem per episode. If I was right about the fixed form part then it'll be easy to figure out which bit goes in what quatrain.

The sonnet sequences we looked at in class so far seem to set out what they're going to be about in the first sonnet, like, this will be about love and also about why we're writing poems about it. Except for the Shakespeare one which is possibly about semen and masturbation and why we're writing poems about it. Or possibly about money. ANYway: Does first episode of a series set out what the sequence is going to be about? Is it still about love and poems? Or death and poems? Well, television instead of poems.

I am going to go and Do Reading. And I am not to listen to Doctor Who until I have done the bit of reading on the handouts. And then I shall read at least one chapter out of the library books that I probably should just take back and swap for ones that are particularly about poems but then all my reading would be about poems and I'd never get around to doing any of it. I'm pretty sure there's a chapter about wars or stuff blowing up around here somewhere.

studious student is studying.
right after lunch.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I was not late for class this morning.
Well, technically I was, by about five minutes, but the teacher was still stuck trying to make the DVD play properly. I don't think it counts if the teacher takes ten minutes to get organised after you arrive. I had time to get the computer set up before I had to take notes, so that's okay.
The renaissance is interesting. I must email my answers from the lesson to the teacher. I shall first leave the computer to defrost. I just got in and computers don't like temperature changes.
I've done a bunch of reading and it's all interesting.
After the lesson I got a vegetable pasty and a cookie (and the cookie froze in my pocket, which was an interesting taste sensation). I looked in the shop for Doctor Who audios but there were only 4 I don't got yet and I wasn't sure I wanted them. I think they're endings and I want beginnings.
Then I caught a bus to the UEA. Talked to E from the S3. Then took books back to library.
Well, book. Overdue. But hey, it's back now.
Then I spent the afternoon in the oversize art books section looking at the Renaissance art. I looked at one book all about jewelry. Because I know what will hold my attention. It links to what we were saying in class today because the half of the jewels that didn't hark back to the Bible were linking to Ovid. Oh, and there were some boats, some jewish engagement rings, and some portraits of royal people.
Then I looked at portraits in other books. Royal people don't look very consistent. Their jewels are more consistent than their face. Some artists must have been very flattering, or else some were rather unwisely unflattering. It's interesting.
I caught the bus back home from outside the UEA.
I listened to the BFA Dreamtime on the bus today. It was a bit... well, I don't know much about Australian aboriginal cultures and Uluru, and I'm not thinking I know more after listening to this audio, but it fits poorly with most other DW. I mean, usually there's science and logic to find out about. In Dreamtime there's an old guy in a rock and everything everyone believed turns out to be trueish. That's... wonky. I dislike it. Even if the solution was to get everyone talking to each other, which is always a good one.

Then there was snow.
I have decided snow is much better the other side of glass.
I have also realised that I should check the severe weather warnings *before* deciding to spend the day in the library, because they were all orange and getting snowed on was predicted, so it wasn't very clever.

But I am home now, and warm, and I will shortly have pancakes.
win.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I finished reading Metamorphoses.
The last book has some quotes I've read elsewhere, including GURPS Shapeshifters, but in different translations. I must say the entire book being 14 syllables to a line (even if it did need to stretch words all out of shape to do it) did not help with the interesting and exciting much. More like I'd be reading di dum di dum di dums and get to something and realise it had got interesting again and have to go back and find the thread a bit. So this isn't my most favourite thing ever. But it's really very impressive and a lot good.

The last book was mostly about reincarnation, vegetarianism, and rather abruptly why Rome Is The Greatest. The threads didn't really stick together in the middle. It starts out being a sort of general summing up of the principles demonstrated in the whole gigantic set of books so far - everything changes and nothing is lost, some changes we call being born and some changes we call dying, but everything, without exception, changes. That was a good bit. Although some of the examples are not good science; the bit about butterflies is true, but the bit about where bees come from isn't, and the idea hyenas can change between male and female is a bit... interesting. Then it's talking about reincarnation and how people come back as animals and animals as people. And that's why it's got some about vegetarianism - basically it's all 'don't eat that it might be your mother'. It do go on a bit though. Felt like reading those really tedious vegan pamphlets that keep banging on. Also there was a bit of 'don't eat beasts you'll be beastly' but I didn't notice it mentioning what eating vegetables does to your nature. And then it went on to 'how Rome nicked the best gods' and 'why Julius Caesar is really cool but the new dude is even cooler psst can has go home nao? kthxby' It went from the big myths from plays and stuff, the stories everyone has heard of, to being all cheerleader propaganda for the people in charge as it was being written, and it was really noticeable and a bit jarring. So not ending on a high. But there's sooooo many interesting bits and cool stories and ideas that I wasn't aware were around in that form at that time (though mostly I should know, but that's what studying is for). Is very good reading. Am glad I bought it. I can read again later.

:-)
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I read more of Ovid's Metamorphoses.
I'm slowing down as it gets closer to the end. I think it's because there's only so many times you can read how everyone dies / turns into birds / turns into crying rocks before you're all 'wait, did I read this bit already? no? whose name was it? which bird? why did it matter again?' And then I put the book down again.

I did like the bit where Ulysses and Ajax get in an argument. It's basically a bit argue between a hero who is good at hitting things until they die, and thinks he's therefor the best, and a hero who is good at persuading other people to hit things until they die while he sneaks around back and steals the important stuff, and thinks that works better. Fighter vs trickster, soldier vs general, sort of thing. Ulysses the tricksy wins, of course. I quite like the bit where he explains how secretly everything everyone else did was an achievement of Ulysses, because without him they'd all have run away or something. The bare faced cheek of it, even if it is true within the story, is quite brilliant.

Also, Circe rocks. I realise she's supposed to be the baddie, and the way she mostly does stuff because some bloke doesn't love her is a bit annoying, but she just goes around changing people into things in large numbers and, and I think this is unique so far, changing them back into humans when she feels like it. And, okay, when Ulysses tells her to. But it's just fun. Greedy mens into pigs! Big long description of what that felt like!

BTW, in this translation, 'groin' means snout and 'tush' means tusk. It's, erm, easy to misread. And somewhat boggling.

Astonied means astonished, standing as if turned to stone. The story explains. Just in case we were wondering.

I forget who was doing what to who when I gave up for the evening, but I predict someone will shortly fly away and someone else will turn into a rock. There was only once it was a flying rock, when a Cyclops threw it, but that was nice for variety. Also it managed the triple and turned into a river too.

Okay, so I'm a bit bored and snarky now.

There's good bits and proper sad tragedy and bits where you get really annoyed at someone who is about to get theirs messily and all that, it's just it keeps on happening.

I want to swap and read about miraculous births and stones being turned into people. Which, come to think, there was a bunch of at the start of the story. But I'm fed up of everyone dying and then the story following the next nearest people until all of them die too. People die, we get it, can they do something else interesting too? Sheesh.

So. Anyway. Book. Classic. Interesting.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
Am reading more Ovid. It's got all the stories in there. And some really wrenching stuff,

Also some LOLs, though usually the sort followed by 'wait, not funny.

Erysicthon's daughter: first he sold her as a slave (not funny) but she did praying and got to be a shapeshifter, turning first into a fisherman and quite decieving her new owner. Then presumably she went home and told her father, because he found out about her new shiny powers and had a bright idea: sell her again! And not just once - sell her as a horse and a cow and a rabbit and all sorts of other things! Then she can change and run away again.

... it's sort of facepalm and LOL at once.

He comes to a gruesome end, of course. Three things that can happen to people in the Metamorphoses so far: gruesome end, changed into something permanently, or turned into stars. Usually the turning into things is instead of a gruesome end, like being thrown off a tower and turning into a bird on the way down.

That was really dramatic when Ladyhawke did it.

Clearly this story store is full of useful and interesting.
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
"The players also made use of an elaborate range of properties. Henslowe's 1598 inventory includes tombs, a chariot, a bedstead, and other properties fairly often used, but also two steeples, several trees, two moss-banks, a hellmouth, and the city of Rome. The last item may have been a painted hanging"

... may?

Theatre: Bigger on the inside.



Speaking of, the Globe theatre had 20 or 24 sides according to this book, and it was the Rose that had 14.
We do not live in Doctor Who.
*sigh*

(Book is Cambridge Companion to English Renaissance Drama. Which I technically don't need to read for months yet. But it's interesting.)
beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
I watched A Performance of Macbeth, from 1979.
It has Magneto and Emperor Palpatine and M in it, which was vaguely amusing.
It was quite a lot boring.
Macbeth shouldn't ought to be boring.
Everyone was wearing black on a black background on a blurry 1979 tape and unless faces were in closeup I might as well have been watching radio. After a while I gave up and drew twirly celtic knot patterns instead. And most of them didn't work right so I got annoyed.
The people who had interesting voices were not the people who had the most lines.
Macbeth was all monotone far too much of the time. Possibly he was going for 'numb' or something, but mostly he was just boring. Blah.
Also the Terry Pratchett version is a lot more memorable than is helpful when trying to concentrate on the actual play. Nanny Ogg and Granny Weatherwax kept heckling in my head.

So now I've watched Hamlet, King Lear, Othello, and Macbeth.
Also more than a year ago Comedy of Errors.
Hamlet was amazing, but I'd still rather be watching the funny ones.

I am grumpy. how can they make witches and knives and sword fights boring? Blah.

Profile

beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
beccaelizabeth

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     12 3
456 7 8 9 10
1112 13 1415 16 17
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 20th, 2025 11:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »